Antifa Fight Club: Teaching The Far Left To Punch And Shoot

From:,  by John Sexton,  on Oct 20, 2017

Buzzfeed published a story yesterday about efforts by Antifa members to train like-minded leftists to throw a punch and fire a gun. This is entirely predictable if you’ve been paying attention to the growth of these movements and yet still a bit worrisome:

The Haymaker Collective is one of many anti-fascist groups that began offering self-defense courses in the wake of Donald Trump’s election and the political upheaval that has followed. Some groups train their members for unforeseen attacks, while other antifa organize more militant trainings to equip people with arms or prepare them for confrontations at protests…

Members of Haymaker and other more militant anti-fascist factions consider the far right a threat, and one they must physically prepare to defend themselves from…

The idea that these are “self-defense” courses is really a bit of Antifa salesmanship which the author of the piece seems to have bought into. As the article makes clear, the members of the Haymaker Collective are watching videos of protests and learning both individual and group fighting techniques. In other words, the group is preparing people to participate in street battles. As we’ve all seen, Antifa is not averse to throwing the first punch in those confrontations. But it’s not just martial arts, Antifa members are also training with firearms:

[Sean] Hines…founded an anarchist and socialist gun club, integrating guns into antifa self-defense to arm working-class people and create a “left-wing militia.” He’s not alone — several antifa groups are taking advantage of lax gun laws in their states and arming their members.

“The more people that are armed, the more that we have the ability to fight police terrorism or fight fascist terrorism,” said Joseph Jordan, an anarchist who participates in Seattle antifa groups. “When the fuckers see that we are willing to shoot back, they back the f**k off.”

On the East Coast, John — who asked to be identified only by his first name, as he has been arrested for possessing illegal ammunition in the past — said he feels the left has not moved quickly enough to acquire guns. “People say, ‘When the revolution happens, we’ll find the weapons.’ But weapons don’t just materialize out of nowhere,” he said. “We should take advantage of the fact that our country lets people bear arms.”…

“If there was a legitimate war, martial arts wouldn’t be that useful,” John said.

Again, this is being described as self-defense but what exactly does fighting “police terrorism” mean to Antifa? We’re talking about anarchists and far-left anti-capitalists, many of whom consider all police officers to be fascists apart from anything the police actually do. Indeed, if you watch enough video of Antifa in action, you’ll notice that they frequently turn their ire against police when there are no “fascists” for them to bash. Here’s part of an FAQ published by Rose City Antifa:

No one has the right to threaten our community with violence. Likewise, we reject the “right” of the government and police – who have more in common with fascists than they do with us – to decide for us when fascists have crossed the line from merely expressing themselves into posing an immediate threat. We will not abdicate our freedom to judge when and how to defend ourselves.

In short, Antifa’s idea of self-defense means they make their own judgment about who is a threat. The threat could be someone saying something they don’t like, i.e. talking. What they are calling self-defense is what many of us would call throwing the first punch in violation of someone else’s civil rights. And if that self-granted right to strike first extends to firing the first shot as well as the first punch, we could have a real problem.

Also, notice the talk from “John” about getting ready for “the revolution.” That’s standard communist agitprop but in this case, does anyone think this sounds like self-defense? That’s not usually how a revolution happens, is it? Again, this is about gearing up for a battle, one that the far left everywhere looks forward to fighting.

Here’s one chapter of Redneck Revolt, a far-left group, firing rifles in the desert in Arizona. At the end of this clip, one of the members charges a Pepe the frog cartoon with a bayonet. It’s silly but the idea that this is purely about self-defense doesn’t really add up.


I don’t see how the antics of Antifa (and other similar groups) can be described as anything but anarchistic and revolutionary. They say that they reserve the right to determine who constitutes a “threat” which allows them to justify whatever actions they deem necessary to remove or eliminate the threat. In other words, laws and lawful activities by any authorities can be disregarded if they conflict with the anarchist’s agenda.

That’s a dangerous position to take, my friends. Things could turn nasty very quickly if they start showing up at protests armed and decide to fire on police.

I can’t help but believe that most of Antifa people are anti-capitalists who long for a communist state and are anxious to engage in real firefights. The problem is the only firefights they’ve been involved with are in video games where they’ve butchered countless zombies or white supremacists and didn’t suffer anything more painful than Nintendinitis or Gamer’s Thumb. I pray that some sort of sanity infects these thugs and they think better about what might happen.



Categories: Political


6 replies

  1. To Antifa regarding their supposed fears of fascism (in the words of Inigo Montoya from The Princess Bride), “You keepah using thatah word. I do not thinkah you know what it means.”

    Fascism: “a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

    If anyone is promoting fascism, it is them, as Kathy noted. But we live in surreal times. The antifa thugs can declare that imaginary fascism gives them – and ONLY them – the right to reject the rule of law. At the same time we undoubtedly have – among our hundreds of thousands of laws – real laws against inciting and threatening violence, yet the authorities do nothing. Certainly if non-existent fascism can justify threats of anarchy, then real threats of anarchy ought to rise to the level of treason…and all that this legally implies. In other words, throw the anarchists in jail and throw the key into the nearest volcanoe.


    • Absolutely right, they apparently either don’t know what “fascism” means or can’t see themselves as they really are – either cause still creates problems. They are trouble with a capital “T” and they need to be taken seriously.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. It’s simple to see how liberal politicians so easily convince them to lean left, when these guys are so stupid and gullible they’ve believed their own lies and don’t realize they are the very fascists they claim to hate.

    Not to make light of it, but from the looks of those targets, I’d say they’re terrible shots. So my advice to the cops is don’t stand shoulder to shoulder when facing them; instead, stand in line single-file and give the head guy a shield. He’ll be safe as well as those behind him who can return fire.

    Liked by 1 person

    • That is really troublesome – it’s like giving a bunch of loaded guns to a gaggle of chimpanzees – who knows who’ll shoot whom? If they’d keep it inhouse, I wouldn’t care, but they are planning to show at some of their “protests” armed – nothing good will come of that.


  3. Agreed, Garnet.

    Here we are, on the 100th Anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution, hearing the same rhetoric and seeing the same actions being repeated.

    The big difference is that Russia didn’t have a middle class and we do, a very big one. So their efforts are doomed to fail. But nonetheless, it could definitely get messy.

    Think Weather Underground of the late ’60s to early ’70s.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: