Group demands University of Chicago pay slavery reparations

From:,  by Justin Caruso,  on Jun 12, 2017

Establishing an African-American studies department is a “no-brainer,” the group says, as should a “concerted effort to recruit and develop” faculty of color.

The group concedes that reparations, which they term a “re-birthing of America,” will be “painful.”

A new group at the University of Chicago is demanding reparations for slavery.

The group, called “Reparations at UChicago Working Group,” or RAUC, recently wrote a piece in the Chicago Reporter, titled “A case for reparations at the University of Chicago,” arguing that the university must do more for black people due to the historical debt of slavery.

“This cannot be a question of what the university will do for black communities. It must be a function of what black communities demand as payment to forgive an unforgivable debt,” they write. “Black people do not need a seat at the university’s reparations table. They need to own that table and have full control over how reparations are structured.”

The article also argues that “[e]stablishing an African American Studies department should be a no-brainer,” as should “a concerted effort to recruit and develop faculty of color while vigorously recruiting and mentoring underrepresented students to attend the university.

“But this should happen anyway,” they write. “It’s not reparations.”

The group also calls capitalism a “monstrosity,” writing of the need to think “beyond the legal framework of ‘damages,’ or the neoliberal ordering of private property rights, or the monstrosity of capitalism.”

“Reparations promise us a monumental re-birthing of America. Like most births, this one will be painful. But the practice of reparations must continue until the world that slavery built is rolled up and a new order spread out in its place.

“Until then, the University of Chicago must begin all of its conversations with the knowledge that it is party to a horrific crime that can never be fully rectified. But still, it must try. And through that trying it must embrace an entirely new mission—one that centers slavery, the lives of the enslaved, and their descendants,” the article concludes.

RAUC consists of, Ashley Finigan, described as “a Ph.D. candidate in the History Department and residential fellow at the Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality.” and Caine Jordan, “a first-year Ph.D. student in the Department of History.”

Two other members are Guy Emerson Mount, who is described as “a Mellon Foundation Fellow and the coordinator of the U.S. History Workshop at the University of Chicago,” and Kai Parker, a Ph.D. student.

Guy Emerson Mount has previously written that America is a “centuries-long nightmare.”

“White progressives, liberals, and centrists are all absolutely befuddled. They simply can’t believe that the America of their dreams is being exposed for the centuries-long nightmare that it is,” he wrote after Trump’s 2016 election win.

“Either way, we must face the facts. American democracy died a long time ago. Perhaps around 1492. Trump may also mean the end of the American Republic,” he also said of Trump’s win.

“To that, I say good riddance. Whatever we build together in its ashes can’t possibly be worse than what we had. Maybe this time we’ll decide on democracy.”

RAUC is hardly the first college group to call for reparations. In 2013,  students at Northwestern University petitioned to give reparations to relatives of Arapaho and Cheyenne victims of the Sandy Creek Massacre in 1864. Similarly, the student government at Western Kentucky voted earlier this year to give black students free tuition as a form of reparations.

Georgetown University professor Michael Eric Dyson suggested in January that whites should open up “individual reparations accounts” to literally pay back black Americans for slavery.

Campus Reform reached out to both UChicago and individual members of RAUC, but they did not respond to requests for comment in time for publication.


Most references in the article seem to be promoting socialism (or communism) in preference to what the authors call the “monstrosity of capitalism.” The United States is characterized as a “centuries-long nightmare.” They say, “American democracy died a long time ago” and “Whatever we build together in its ashes can’t possibly be worse than what we had.” Apparently, these authors are not what we might call “American patriots.” They, in fact, dismiss what can only be described as the greatest nation ever to reside on earth as a “centuries-long nightmare,” there are millions of Americans who would differ with that characterization.

And reparations: reparations are characterized by some Blacks as restitution a for a historical debt of slavery. A debt? Who incurred such a debt?

Slavery had been practiced as ordinary commerce in North America from early colonial days and was legal in all Thirteen Colonies at the time of the Declaration of Independence in 1776. Like it or not, slavery was legal and widespread in in the United States during the 18th and 19th centuries and wasn’t completely ended until the Thirteenth Amendment was ratified in January of 1865.

Identifying slavery that was legal in Colonial America at the time and only later, decades later, became viewed as a crime is creating an ex-post facto crime for which activists Blacks are now demanding reparations. Ex post facto laws retroactively punish conduct that was legal when committed. They are prohibited by Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, of the U.S. Constitution. An ex-post facto law is considered a hallmark of tyranny because it deprives people of a sense of what behavior will or will not be punished and allows for random punishment at the whim of those in power.

The truth of the matter is that slavery, as repugnant as it seems today, was commonplace and legal in Colonial America. No debt was incurred, no debt is owed. It’s just that racist Blacks see the reparations issue as being a possible financial windfall and are fighting hard to build a case that current day Blacks are owed financial compensation for what happened (legally) 150 years ago.

The authors are supposed to be learned academics who, in my view, are blinded by racism against Whites and the notion that they can parlay the issue of slavery into windfall profits.








Categories: Political

Tags: ,

3 replies

  1. There’s only one appropriate response to this madness: “No.”

    Today’s whites shouldn’t have to justify why they aren’t going to pay “reparations” to people who were never harmed for actions that today’s whites aren’t responsible for. If the professional grievance thieves don’t like it that’s too damned bad.


  2. Based on the group’s statement, it’s an unforgivable debt and a horrific crime that can never be fully rectified, so why would whites even bother to try? If there’s no forgiveness, then no amount of payment would ever satisfy them.

    I just watched a 1-minute video where some BLM gal with a megaphone was demanding the same thing, except it was so full of F-bombs it was hard to understand for all the bleeps. Whites need to give them all their money and let them run the country, blah blah blah…

    This whole thing is so absurd it wouldn’t even make a decent B-class movie. More bullies that need to be told to sit down and shut up.


  3. Here’s a suggestion for some “reparations” for that “historical debt”: we’ll transport anyone who wants it back to the country of origin from where their ancestors were unwillingly taken.

    Now, if this country is such a nightmare, I assume they’ll be clamoring for that free passage back to Namibia or Congo or wherever.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: