Published June 14, 2017 | By Jack Kelly

[This letter to Rich Lowry, Editor of National Review, was sent today]
Dear Rich:
You should be ashamed of having published Michael Brendan Dougherty’s “The President Can Be Put On Tilt” on June 9. Even cash-strapped conservative journals of opinion should have editors and fact checkers.
According to Dougherty, “The very fact of the hearing was an unforced disaster for the president.” Even Chris Matthews figured out the opposite is true.
*Why yes, I did tell the president three times he wasn’t being investigated, Comey said in public, on the record, under oath.
*No, Mr. Trump has never been the subject of an FBI criminal or counterintelligence investigation. News stories that implied he was are false.
Comey drove a wooden stake through the heart of the Russia collusion narrative, which is why the Left has moved on to the obstruction narrative.
If Comey had said this publicly in February or March, he might still be FBI director. . .
According to Dougherty, . . . There’s been one story after another about “dysfunction” on the White House staff.
The Bannon-Kushner feud. Then Priebus was going to be fired. Then Sebastian Gorka’s head was on the block. Then Trump was “screaming” at McMaster. Then Kushner was in trouble. Then Priebus was in the hot seat again. Now Trump is said to be unhappy with Sessions.
ALL are still on the job.
Bannon and Trump are notorious for gaslighting. You should have Mr. Daugherty look up the word.
Some Trump tweets have been ill advised. But more often than not, they have driven the news cycle. Comey said it was this tweet May 12 that prompted him to leak his memo about their dinner conversation Jan. 27.
CNN and the New York Times ran stories about what (allegedly) was said before Trump’s tweet. Since only Trump and Comey were present, the leak had to originate with Comey.
Comey may have perjured himself. He definitely broke FBI rules, may have disclosed classified information. . . Comey’s testimony undermined efforts to portray him as pure as the driven snow.
. . . if Comey’s account of their meeting is 100 percent accurate, why is he spooked by the possibility Trump may have a recording of it?
It appears as if Trump’s tweet goaded Comey into committing a colossal blunder.
According to Dougherty, “The Saudis seem to have played Trump like a fiddle. Their cartoonish flattery of Trump seems to have led him to tweet angrily against the latest enemy of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, even though Qatar has been hosting the American military for 15 years”.
Qatar is the leading financier of Islamist terror, their banker, a “safe place” where terrorists wanted in other countries can relax in luxury. . .
The al Udeid air base does not make Qatar a U.S. ally. The al Thanis are famous for double dealing. . . Since Dougherty missed the obvious – that reining in Qatar is essential to defeating Islamist terror – I don’t expect him to notice the tectonic shift taking place in the Middle East.
It isn’t just Saudi Arabia that’s pressing Qatar to stop financing terror. So are Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Jordan, Libya, at least three Muslim-majority black African countries.
Something I never expected to see in my lifetime is happening. During the president’s visit to Riyadh, the leaders of most Sunni majority countries declared the Dar al Harb is no more. The long overdue reformation of Islam is underway. That Saudi Arabia is driving this train is especially significant, because ISIS, al Qaida, other Sunni Islamist terrorists derive their ideology from the Wahabbi/Salafi sects. When even (some) Wahabbi clerics preach tolerance, and emancipation of women, there’s a tectonic shift happening.
The changes have been spectacular since Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud became king on Jan. 23, 2015. . . “Our vision is a tolerant country with Islam as its constitution and moderation as its method,” bin Salman said in a 2016 interview.
Mr. Dougherty has things exactly backward. Trump didn’t tweet against Qatar because the Saudis asked him to. The Arab coalition is taking action against Qatar because the president asked them to during the summit in Riyadh.
Trump is the Rodney Dangerfield of presidents at home. But Arab leaders see him as a “strong horse” who can (help) bring peace to the region. Both the Saudis et al and the Qataris have praised his offer to mediate.
I was a Marine, a Green Beret, a Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force. Nothing is more important to me than the security of the United States. Nothing ticks me off more than twerps like Dougherty who side with America’s enemies for domestic political reasons.
As for differences in tone between the president and Tillerson, kindly explain to Mr. Dougherty how “good cop, bad cop” works.
And here’s a pro tip for your writers: don’t opine on subjects you know nothing about.
Rich, you made a mistake when you hired this doofus. . .
Jack Kelly

Categories: General, Humor & Satire, Political

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 replies

  1. CW, I disagree with Dougherty’s presumption that Trump is emotionally unhinged. He has been using that “trait” as a weapon for over a year, to excellent effect. He has exposed the bias of the MSM as no one else could have done by continually driving the news cycle via Twitter. In the process he has diverted their attention from the genuinely conservative reforms he is enacting across the Leviathan.

    His unprecedented style is not to my taste either, but I applaud his successes, and greatly enjoy seeing the MSM hoisted on their own petard. Repeatedly!

    I think you, and Dougherty, mistake his tactics for some level of personality disorder. His children don’t demonstrate that. There is not a single elected or appointed official In Washington DC that is not an egotist. Trump has also played the role on TV for a long time to his tremendous benefit. Those who know him say that he is quite sober and gracious when not before the camera. He can tone it down when he wants, as shown in his post shooting announcement yesterday. Relax, take off the partisan MSM blinders, and enjoy the show!


  2. With all due respect to Mr. Kelly I think he was a bit harsh on Mr. Dougherty’s article (and on the brilliant Rich Lowry, with whom I agree 99.9% of the time).

    The main gist of Dougherty’s post, IMO, was contained in this sentence:

    “[The Comey hearing] reveals a flaw of character that will be a problem for the president going forward. Namely this: Donald Trump’s psychological state is easy to read and easy to manipulate. The president can be trolled into making grievous mistakes. He is far too obsessed with the news cycle to act soberly. That is a serious political risk for Republicans. It is a significant tail risk for our nation.”

    Dougherty also said: “Trump cannot calm himself down and let the cloud pass over his head with the next gust in the news cycle. This is the problem that everyone, even those sympathetic to Trump’s politics, identified before he took the job. He simply cannot govern his own emotions. And a man who cannot do that is unfit to govern anything else.”


    Forgive me but only a diehard Trump fan who can no longer be objective could possibly disagree with those observations, because they are spot on. Should Trump have fired Comey? Yes, for the simple reason that Comey showed poor judgment in the way he handled the Hillary Clinton investigation and can therefore not be trusted. But Trump knew this on day one, so why wait five months to fire him? That makes it looks too self-serving and plays right into the hands of Democrats. This is what you get when you elect a non-conservative.

    Mr. Kelly conceded that: “Some Trump tweets have been ill advised.”

    This leads me to ask: how many ill-advised tweets does it take to damage a presidency? The answer could be as little as one, it just depends on the tweet. If we’re only on month six and already have some “ill-advised” tweets then Republicans have good reason to be nervous.

    As for Qatar I don’t doubt Mr. Kelly’s expertise on the subject but I think Daughtery’s point can’t be easily dismissed. As far as I know Ronald Reagan never played “good cop, bad cop” with his Secretary of State and I’m having trouble seeing the wisdom in sending mixed messages to other nations. Typically the expectation is that the president will pretty much be on the same page as those who report to him.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: