Muslims in Europe – A Preview of What’s Coming?

Vox Voxplains Radical Islam As No Threat To Americans Or The West

(from The Federalist)

Will Wilkinson at Vox insists there are no reasonable arguments to be made that radical Islam poses any threat to the United States or Western civilization.

Wilkinson compares the military budgets and economic strengths of the United States and its NATO allies with those of the nine top-spending Muslim-majority countries, pointing out that the West has the obvious advantage.

Do you know what a “straw man” argument is?

Well, you just saw an example of one. The concern about Islam “invading” the U.S. isn’t about a military threat; it’s about a covert ideological invasion that brings with it the threat of Muslims eventually demanding incorporation of Sharia Law into American life.

Our Constitution and Sharia Law cannot co-exist. They are diametrically opposed to one another in several important areas and since the United States is a constitutional republic, the Constitution is our supreme law.

Sharia is in direct conflict with the constitution and our Bill of Rights. Each requires adherence to its precepts and only one can serve as a country’s supreme law. Sharia Law has no place in the United States.


Germany Confiscating Homes to Use for Muslim Migrants: “A Massive Attack on the Property Rights”  

(from Pamela Geller)

Authorities in Hamburg, the second-largest city in Germany, have begun confiscating private dwellings to ease a housing shortage — one that has been acutely exacerbated by Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to allow more than two million migrants into the country in recent years.

In an unprecedented move, Hamburg authorities confiscated six residential units in the Hamm district near the city center. A trustee appointed by the city is now renovating the properties and will rent them — against the will of the owner — to tenants chosen by the city. District spokeswoman Sorina Weiland said that all renovation costs will be billed to the owner of the properties.

In November 2015, lawmakers in Berlin considered emergency legislation that would have allowed local authorities to seize private residences to accommodate asylum seekers. The proposal would have authorized police forcibly to enter private homes and apartments without a warrant to determine their suitability as housing for refugees and migrants.

Let me get this straight, Angela Merkel encouraged more than 2,000,000 migrants to come to Germany and now, to accommodate them, some cities are seizing privately owned housing – confiscating private structures to house the excessive influx of people who can’t support themselves and are homeless.

Who could have seen this coming? (A rhetorical question)

We should be wary of something similar happening here. Barack Obama was hell-bent on bringing “refugees” from Muslim countries her by the thousands. They were supposedly being persecuted in their home countries (like Syria), but what of Christians being persecuted in those countries? He didn’t seem to be interested in them.

Just compare the ratio of Muslims invited to come here with the number of Christians. In 2016, Obama admitted 12,486 Muslims and 68 Christians. Where did his priorities lie, with Muslims or with Christians?  

The United States was founded on and has remained primarily a Christian nation since its inception, wouldn’t Christians assimilate more easily? And they are being persecuted mercilessly in Muslim countries. Wouldn’t it make more sense to bring in a greater number of Christians?

We need to be vigilant about what’s happening in Europe. It appears to be a preview of what would likely occur here if we are “invaded” by masses of Muslim “refugees.”


Categories: Political

Tags: ,

3 replies

  1. I totally agree with your characterization of Wilkinson’s argument as a straw man, Garnet, but would also like to point out that our military superiority is despite the Left’s best efforts to disarm us. If not for Republicans insisting on national security we wouldn’t even have that going for us.

    Leftists like Wilkinson are never happy unless they are enabling our enemies.

    As for what’s happening in Germany, that’s really unbelievable, but then again they have their leftists too.


  2. The methods might differ slightly, but it looks to me like it’s basically already here.

    As awful as it is, the housing situation in Germany isn’t all that different than what’s being done here with the illegal immigrants. Instead of using eminent domain to take over property, we build shelters and camps to house all the illegals that poured over our border. Instead of the property owner bearing the costs, all the taxpayers bear the cost.

    Just like the illegals, the refugees that O imported all receive government benefits, which helps with housing and food, and again, the taxpayers foot that bill too.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I find it strange that Germany tries to obliterate anything that has to do with Facism or Nazism but doesn’t find anything wrong with the taking of personal property from others and then make the original owner responsible to pay for anything after it was confiscated. There is a lot very terribly wrong with that and if the German people are so besides themselves to not go with nationalism and don’t see this a threat they have once again after 86 years fell under the spell

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: