Source says: Potential ‘smoking gun’ showing Obama administration spied on Trump team is coming

From:,  by James Rosen,  on Mar 23, 2017

Republican congressional investigators expect a potential “smoking gun” establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee this week, a source told Fox News.

Classified intelligence showing incidental collection of Trump team communications, purportedly seen by committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and described by him in vague terms at a bombshell Wednesday afternoon news conference, came from multiple sources, Capitol Hill sources told Fox News. The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretapped him in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.

The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.

The key to that conclusion is the unmasking of selected U.S. persons whose names appeared in the intelligence, the sources said, adding that the paper trail leaves no other plausible purpose for the unmasking other than to damage the incoming Trump administration.

The FBI hasn’t been responsive to the House Intelligence Committee’s request for documents, but the National Security Agency is expected to produce documents to the committee by Friday. The NSA document production is expected to produce more intelligence than Nunes has so far seen or described – including what one source described as a potential “smoking gun” establishing the spying.

Some time will be needed to properly assess the materials, with the likely result being that congressional investigators and attorneys won’t have a solid handle on the contents of the documents – and their implications – until next week.

Because Nunes’s intelligence came from multiple sources during a span of several weeks, and he has not shared the actual materials with his committee colleagues, he will be the only member of the panel in a position to know whether the NSA has turned over some or all of the intelligence he is citing. However, Fox News was told Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., had been briefed on the basic contents of the intelligence described by Nunes.

CIA Director Mike Pompeo is also sympathetic to the effort to determine, with documentary evidence, the extent of any alleged Obama administration spying on the Trump team, sources said.

At a dramatic Wednesday news conference, Nunes claimed to have seen evidence that members of the Trump transition team, possibly including the president-elect, were subjected to “incidental surveillance” collection that Nunes characterized as legal but troubling.

“What I’ve read bothers me,” he told reporters, “and I think it should bother the president himself, and his team because I think some of it seems to be inappropriate.”

Schiff blasted Nunes for not coming first to the Intelligence Committee with the information.

“If accurate, this information should have been shared with members of the committee, but it has not been,” Schiff said in a Wednesday statement.

James Rosen joined Fox News Channel (FNC) in 1999. He currently serves as the chief Washington correspondent and hosts the online show “The Foxhole.” His latest book is “A Torch Kept Lit: Great Lives of the Twentieth Century” (Crown Forum, October 4, 2016).


When it was announced in January that Obama was expanding the NSA’s authority to share intelligence with 16 other agencies, I wondered why.

If expanding the availability of intelligence to 16 other agencies was a good idea, why wasn’t it enacted early in Obama’s term? Why did he wait until the final days of his presidency to make NSA’s intelligence available to the other agencies? Why wouldn’t he have wanted those rules in place during his administration? Didn’t he want to govern with those rules in place?

Now we know.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the N.S.A. to disseminate “raw signals intelligence information,” on Jan. 3, 2017 – in the final days of Obama’s administration.

I assumed that Obama wanted to assure that leaks from the Trump administration would be forthcoming. But while that may have been a side benefit, there was another reason – the data that had already been gathered by Obama’s surveillance of Trump would be available to leak to the unwashed masses – and now with names “unmasked.” Obama was littering the political lawn with lots of steaming piles of rhetoric knowing that eventually, Trump or one of his top advisors would step in one. And perhaps, with any luck, that would be his undoing.

And now we know why.

What a piece of work Barack Obama is/was. Calling him a snake-oil salesman is an insult to snake-oil salesmen. He is without character, without conscience; a liar and a rotten, repugnant, and reprehensible individual who is not worthy of any benefit of doubt. He cannot be trusted. His actions have been traitorous.



Categories: Political


6 replies

  1. Can anyone recall even a single thing Barack Obama ever did that wasn’t politically self-serving? That’s what makes the whole spying on Trump accusation completely believable. Obama is the Nixon that the Left made Nixon out to be, and then some.

    If I had Trump’s ear I would urge him to consider this an act of war and to leave no stone unturned to find anyone that can be held to account. He probably won’t be able to touch Obama (the worst villains always make sure they’re untouchable), but he could make a painful example of anyone who helped with Obama’s devious plans.


    • Great comment, CW and one with which I totally agree. We can’t allow Obama to go “gentle into that good night.” He needs to suffer consequences for ALL of the problems that he inflicted on the country and Trump has the phone and the pen and the power to make life miserable for the tan choomhead.


  2. Trying to sort this out and understand it all gets somewhat confusing, but from what I understand the FISA warrants can only be used in regard to gather foreign intelligence information, thus the accusations of Russian involvement with the Trump campaign and the elections. That supposedly justified the surveillance, which was all within O’s authority at the time.

    The only thing O did wrong was the crime of omission when he (indirectly) requested the second warrant. He left out Trump’s name which made it easier to obtain the warrant. The law forbids lying to any judicial officer to obtain any means of surveillance. That is a crime, but it won’t matter in the long run, because the people involved aren’t going to blow the whistle on him. His team would have to admit they perjured themselves to get the warrant.

    What did it gain them? Nothing that I can see. It’s a time-consuming, money-wasting distraction that won’t take Trump down. Even if it did, that doesn’t put Hillary in there. There may be a smoking gun, but unless it’s a hand-written confession from O, this all goes away.


    • My understanding is that the warrants were ok, it was two other things that are turds floating in the punchbowl – the leaks themselves and the “unmasking” of U.S. citizen’s names in the documents that were leaked. Sooner or later, with a guarantee of no prosecution, someone will spill the beans. I hope that I live to see it.


  3. The liberals have been denying this for months. I truly believe it’s been going much longer than after the election. What bothers me even more ( and the left is so good at this denying and putting the fault on the other guy) is that no one is investigating Podesta for his ties to Russia or Clinton’s for that matter.
    They need to break this wide open and hopefully ( I doubt very much it will) tie Obama into it so he could be hung out to dry. But that won’t happen in my lifetime. The left will do every thing they can to to say it’s only the right


    • I surely wouldn’t stake my life on the TRUTH about Obama coming out in my lifetime either, but one thing is plain – Trump won’t hold back any “leaking” information that reflects badly on Obama. I think that Trump will gleefully watch Obama swinging in the wind if really bad stuff comes out.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: