Was Paul Ryan’s ACA Revision Designed to Fail?

Fox News reports that House Republican leaders are forging ahead Wednesday on their newly released Obamacare replacement legislation, pitching it as a first step toward fulfilling their campaign promise — despite mounting resistance from the party’s right and center flanks and warnings that it might not have the votes to pass.

“We have serious concerns,” said House Freedom Caucus co-chairman Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C.

“I don’t think it’s going to bring down the cost of insurance,” Ohio GOP Rep. Jim Jordan told “Fox & Friends” Wednesday morning, vowing to introduce a “clean repeal.”

Conservatives have voiced specific concerns that the new plan would continue the Medicaid expansion for a few more years before a transition, replace existing insurance subsidies with a new system of tax credits and allow insurance companies to impose a surcharge for lapsed coverage.

As House conservatives plan to introduce their own bill — a so-called “clean repeal” of the Affordable Care Act — two key committees are taking up the legislation unveiled late Monday by GOP leaders. The House Energy and Commerce and the Ways and Means committees began “mark-up” sessions Wednesday morning, where lawmakers have their first chance to change and amend the plan.

This could be a contentious and drawn-out process, as GOP leaders try to convince the rank-and-file to work with the product they put forward Monday, rather than push competing legislation.

Passage of the Republican bill comes down to the numbers. The GOP can only lose 21 votes before the measure fails on a party-line vote in the House.

The Freedom Caucus has a bylaw that compels its members to vote as a bloc if 80 percent of its 40-plus members feel the same on a given issue — more than enough to derail the legislation.

Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., said Tuesday he doesn’t think Ryan has the votes unless he draws Democratic support, according to The Hill.

On Tuesday, Ryan said he could “guarantee” the bill would get a majority 218 votes to pass the House.

~~~~~~~~~

There was never a chance that Dems would support any major Republican changes to the ACA, but what’s interesting is the amount of opposition that the bill has rapidly generated among conservatives. Paul Ryan couldn’t get any of the conservatives on board with his plan, so is he really that inept or is it possible he doesn’t want a repeal plan to pass?

By no means is Ryan a true conservative, nor does he support smaller government. But he’s not inept. He’s an experienced lawmaker who knows how to work the system. He knows how to move legislation forward and he knows what needs to be done to advance an agenda. During O’s term he pushed through legislation for a straight repeal that he knew had no chance of being approved, and now that they have a chance to actually repeal it, his efforts come up extremely lame. Why?

Ryan has spent his time as Speaker going to great lengths to avoid upsetting the Dems by handing over big budget legislation and caving to their demands. He is well aware of what he’ll have to endure if he repeals O’care straight up.  There will be huge protests in the spotlight, phony claims by nasty Democrats who will generate a PR war that historically he’s gone to great lengths to avoid.

In order to accomplish that, he pretends he’s fighting and ignores the blowback from the Republicans. When his guarantee gets shot down we’ll see the faux disappointment in his face followed by his promise to go back to the drawing board and try again. This gives him the best of both worlds along with job longevity. What’s best for the people and the country simply does not matter.

~Kathy



Categories: Political

Tags: ,

4 replies

  1. That’s an interesting theory, Kathy.

    We all knew we were in trouble when Republicans got rid of John Boehner only to replace him with Paul Ryan, who at one time had conservatives – including myself – fooled into believing that he was one of them. Everyone should know better by now. You hit the nail on the head when you said Ryan is trying to avoid a nasty PR fight with democrats. He wants to be seen as the great peacemaker, the guy who can keep gov’t running along because he can get the deals done. As I say ad nauseam here, you can’t get the policy right when the motive is wrong, and keeping the peace is the wrong motive. The Founders weren’t interested in keeping the peace when they wrote the Constitution. They were interested in preserving liberty and protecting rights. THAT is what the goal should be, even if it means having a nasty fight now and then. Besides, Democrats are about as riled up as they’ve ever been already. That makes this the perfect time to have this fight.

    This battle over Obamacare reminds me of somewhat of the battle we just had in the Republican primary, where conservatives lost because they wouldn’t stand strong for a conservative candidate, and one by one they caved. If true conservatives stand strong against this bad plan, that will leave Ryan & Co. with only two options: (1) To go along with conservatives and throw out this notion of Obamacare-lite; or (2) Leave things as they are, allowing Obamacare to implode on its own. I’d like to think that with those as the alternatives, Ryan & Co. could be persuaded to go along with conservatives. Personally I’d rather see the Obama/Democrat disaster of Obamacare implode into a big mess even though it will cost me money than to see Republicans become the creators/owners of Trumpcare aka Obamcare 2.0.

    Liked by 2 people

    • When the House members chose Paul Ryan (over real conservatives) they got a John Boehner clone minus the tan. Ryan didn’t want the job but they talked him into taking it and now he’s their biggest problem.

      “The Founders weren’t interested in keeping the peace when they wrote the Constitution.”

      Exactly CW, and today none of them should be concerned about it either – that’s not their job. Besides, the Dems are already belly-aching with no provocation, so let’s give them some, in the form of good legislation that actually works for the people.

      If the guys in the Freedom Caucus will stand up to him, for once in their lives, they have the power and the perfect opportunity to get this right. They have stated they’re willing to accept the repeal package that O vetoed in 2015, so there’s no need to start over, when they can use that. Get it done already and stop wasting time.

      Liked by 1 person

      • It’s my understanding that in order to do this via budget reconciliation they just need 51 votes in the senate. That means the moderates can’t afford to lose more than two Republicans, i.e. they NEED conservatives. Will they re-work their plan to get conservatives on board or will they weaken it further it to get a few Democrats? That will be the real test of who Ryan & Co. really are.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Good point, CW. It needs to be reworked in order get the approval of Ted Cruz and probably a handful of others like Mike Lee, Rand Paul and maybe Tim Scott. That might be a difficult task for Ryan, since he can’t even get it past his fellow Representatives yet.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: