The Timeline of Obama Admin Spying on the Trump Campaign

Written by Sundance, 3-3-17 at the Conservative Treehouse:


Conservative Treehouse states they always fall back upon timelines to see the larger motives, intents and operational objectives of participants. They also credit Breitbart for putting some of the pieces together, to which they’ve added more pieces and created the timeline.

1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.

2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing emails, joking: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.

5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier” compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and that it had been circulating in Washington.

  • Admiral Michael Rogers had a visit with President Trump on Friday, November 11th.
  • According to the Executive Order rule changes DNI James Clapper signed off on December 15th.
  • General Michael Flynn spoke to the Russian Ambassador on December 29th
  • Dec 29th 2016 – Obama announces sanctions on Russia

6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes, and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly or leaked.

The new rules, which were issued in an unclassified document, entitled Procedures for the Availability or Dissemination of Raw Signals Intelligence Information by the National Security Agency (NSA), significantly relaxed longstanding limits on what the NSA may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations.

These operations are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. Surveillances include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls, and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.

The changes initiated by the Obama Administration in its waning days empowered far more agents and officials to search through raw intelligence data.

  • Jan 3rd 2017 – Loretta Lynch signs off on rule changes for phone taps.
  • Jan 12th 2017 –  WaPo reports On Phone Calls Anonymous Intel Sources
  • Jan 15th 2017 – VP Pence appears on Face the nation.
  • Jan 20th 2017 – Inauguration
  • Jan 23rd 2017 –  FBI reports nothing unlawful in content of Flynn call
  • Jan 26th 2017 – Sally Yates (acting DOJ) informs President Trump there might be a conflict between VP Pence’s stated TV version (was told by Flynn), and what Intel community communicate to Yates that Flynn actually expressed to Russia.
  • Jan 27th 2017 – White House counsel begins investigation to discrepancy.

7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports, on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties.

Other news outlets also report the existence of a multi-agency working group to coordinate investigations across the government,” though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would have been secret and involved classified information.

8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was  part of routine spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them.

Sally Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials. The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and once at a meeting in Sessions’ Senate office.

The Post suggests that the two meetings contradict Sessions testimony at his confirmation hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the “dossier” of ongoing contacts.

The New York Times, in covering the story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve” intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as well.

In summary: the Obama administration sought, and eventually obtained, authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign; continued monitoring the Trump team even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found; then relaxed the NSA rules to allow evidence to be shared widely within the government, virtually ensuring that the information, including the conversations of private citizens, would be leaked to the media.


Considering that O’s admin spied on the media in 2013, it’s not surprising to learn that they also spied on Trump’s campaign. The other non-surprise is that the media, even though they have many of these same puzzle pieces, won’t ask the question. Why?

Why did O file a request in June 2016 to have Trump and his people spied upon?

Why didn’t O cease the spying in October once it was determined there was nothing to it?

Naturally, O denies having anything to do with this. He even went so far as to have his spokesman issue this statement:

“A cardinal rule of the Obama Administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice.”

1. Obama’s administration had no cardinal rules, except to lie about everything.
2. White House official or not – someone interfered or Hillary would be in prison.
3. Trump should have cleaned house at the DOJ the minute he was sworn in.

This stinks to high heaven and it is my fervent hope that Trump and his admin can prove O’s hands are dirty. Somewhere along the line somebody had to have slipped up. Find it.


Categories: Political

Tags: ,

6 replies

  1. We’re about to witness more proof (as if we needed any) of what utter hypocrites and liars Democrats really are, because they’ve spent that past 40+ years enshrining Richard Nixon as the sleaziest man on Earth for Watergate but they are about to shrug off and defend Barack Hussein Obama in spite of the growing evidence that he is far worse than Nixon ever was. Wait for it.

    None of this surprises me in the least. I only hope Trump can do what no Republican has ever been successful at and that is to turn the tide of opinion against a Democrat icon while the whole swamp is circling the wagons.

    Thanks for sharing this one, Kathy. The more people know about the thuggery of Obama & Co. the better.


    • For months the liberal media has been pumping out propagandized headlines implying Trump had ties to Russia. Since it’s all fictional, they don’t have a smidgen of evidence and anonymous sources don’t count. Assuming Trump is innocent, he has nothing to lose by pursuing this and may have everything to gain if the investigation turns up proof of O’s wiretapping.

      Now that Lynch is out of the way, perhaps we can dig for facts rather than gloss over it, although James Comey is still iffy. He’s trying to throw up roadblocks, but perhaps he should remember that he can be replaced too if he doesn’t do his job. (In my book, he should already be gone)


      • I beg to differ on one thing, Kathy, and that’s the notion that Trump has nothing to lose if he’s wrong. His credibility is on the line because he’s making a powerful accusation. You can only cry wolf so many times. Let’s hope he has some solid evidence to back up his tweets.


      • Ah! Excellent point, CW. I was thinking more in terms of voters, but you’re right – his credibility is on the line. So far he’s been proven right on most of his accusations, but this one is much bigger and will be hard to trace to O. He better have some super sleuths on his team.


  2. Your timeline is missing at least one really stinking checkpoint.
    4.(a) October 31: Hillary tweets about supposedly secret FISA subpoena finding. Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet on October 31st stating that ‘computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server’.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: