Is February 28, 2017, ‘The Night the Democratic Party Died’?

From: pjmedia.com,  by Roger L. Simon,  on Feb 28, 2017

demos-sat-trump-speech-nh-1-816x460

I was once a Democrat.  In those days, I thought I was on the team of truth, justice, and the American way. It was fun to be a Democrat then.  But… Bye, bye Miss American Pie.  Drove my Chevy to the levee but the levee was dry.  I woke up.

I’m no longer a Democrat (it’s been many years now), and though on the rarest of occasions I worried I’d made a mistake, Tuesday night watching the shell-shocked faces of the Democrats on the floor of Congress while Donald Trump delivered his magnificent speech, I knew I had made no error.  I even wondered what was going on in my head in those isolated moments I doubted myself.

The Democratic Party members watching that speech looked like a party of the living dead.  They didn’t know how to react.  They didn’t know if they were Americans.  They didn’t know who they were.

Every time Trump called for bipartisanship for the good of our country, they winced.  They couldn’t stand it and didn’t know how to react because they are the least bipartisan people in the world and they scarcely know what cooperating is.  Working together is not in their natures.  Yes, they talk about it endlessly but they never do it. (See: the history of the Soviet Union) Maybe it’s not in their DNA.  (I should check mine.)

When the speech was over — after there was no longer a dry eye in the house from the introduction of the widow of the Navy SEAL — they left the room faster than fans of the losing team after the Super Bowl, only in this case they left so stunned you had to wonder if they would ever win the game again or even compete.

The Democrats — the silly ladies dressed in white and all the others — bet the house that Trump would make a fool of himself and Donald cut the legs out from under them. And when you bet the house and lose, you go home bankrupt.  And without a home to go to.

He cut the Democrats’ legs out in the worst way, exposing them for the empty party they are with nothing going for them but identity politics. Yet, it is becoming increasingly obvious that if anyone does anything for the inner cities, it will be Trump the builder, not the Democrats who had a chance for fifty or sixty years and did nothing.  Bye, bye, identity politics.   No wonder Maxine Waters is so apoplectic.

Yes, Trump delivered a speech for the ages.  Tucker Carlson, who is solidifying his position as the most perceptive pundit on television, again got it right, saying the president had “set the template” for future presidential addresses.  He had. Bravo to him and to speechwriter Stephen Miller, who is rapidly becoming the most distinguished graduate ever of Santa Monica High, where he was supposedly persona non grata while he attended.

Now I know Democrats are praying Donald will start tweeting and say something outrageous they can make fun of or at the very least deliberately misconstrue.  And you can trust CNN and the rest to pick apart a million things.  Where’s the money going to come from for this and that?  But it’s not going to matter that much.  Trump is a great American optimist and we saw Tuesday night that he is more than capable of bringing the country along with him.

We are in a new era. I’m 95% excited but 5% blue about what is happening — not because I have even an iota of regret about leaving liberalism, especially now.  But because, as Trump himself said the other day, we need a two-party system and I strongly suspect, even with the unlimited pockets of George Soros, the Democratic Party, at least as we know it, is dying.  All those crazy protests at town halls and the mass demonstrations of women racing around in vagina hats are the death throes of a movement with nothing to say.

The question is, will history look at February 28, 2017, as “The Night the Democratic Party Died” or at the very least the beginning of the end?  No one can be certain, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it does.

Roger L. Simon is an award-winning novelist, Academy Award-nominated screenwriter and co-founder of PJ Media.  His latest book is I Know Best:  How Moral Narcissism Is Destroying Our Republic, If  It Hasn’t Already. You can follow him on Twitter @rogerlsimon. 

~~~~~~~~~~

This day after, I can’t count the occasions of democrats committing unforced errors that I’ve seen. They are apparently shell-shocked and don’t have any coherent response except to say that the president’s words were just that – words. They are doing their best to diminish the optimism that most of the country felt after viewing Trump’s speech. I thought that Chuck Schumer’s response, that he couldn’t get behind ANYTHING that the President proposed was especially damning. What have they to offer? Nothing, but condemnation of whatever originates from the other side of the aisle.

For my money, one of the reasons that Trump was elected was that most Americans were fed up with political business as usual, fed up with political correctness, and Trump offered an alternative. Now, the democrats are faced with the reality that they lost the presidency and President Trump seems to be winning hearts and minds and they have no standard-bearer to change the direction to one more comfortable for a party seemingly being hijacked by the most liberal of their members. What are they to do? It’s obvious that they simply don’t know.

BTW, be sure to take the opportunity to listen to Don McLean’s American Pie – that’s some good stuff.

Garnet92.



Categories: Political

Tags:

4 replies

  1. Journalists don’t have a problem with asking Republicans questions that are overly-complicated and take 90 seconds just to vocalize and five minutes for them to respond. When the clowns like Schumer make boneheaded statements like not being able to get behind anything Trump proposed, just once I’d like to hear a ‘journalist’ ask why and make him explain his reasons. Probe him on those responses and force him to expose his juvenile and petty answers for Americans to hear.

    In terms of a Trump speech, this was magnificent; perhaps not by other standards, but for him it was. I will give credit where it’s due though, and that’s to the speech writer who made him sound presidential and unTrumplike.

    If the Dems are in the process of dying, which seems to be the case, I just wish they’d do it more quietly and without all the whining and juvenile behavior. They’re setting the record for the longest temper tantrum in history and it’s disgusting.

    Like

    • I can’t believe the asinine statement by Schumer that he couldn’t work with Trump on ANYTHING. What a stupid move. Politically, he ought to be saying that he might find a way to negotiate with Trump to be sure that his concerns are met. That way he’d appear more statesman like – while still not going along with anything covertly. Going public with such an obstructionist statement ought to turn off some people who actually want to see government do something for a change.

      Like

  2. You’re not American if you don’t love “American Pie!”

    I don’t want to be a wet blanket but I think it’s a stretch to call Trump’s speech “magnificent.” That word should be reserved for speeches so powerful that they change the way people think philosophically. Trump reinforced the approval of his base and perhaps pleased some of his Republican detractors, if he won over any Democrats it was by offering up some of the government largess they love so much. Assuaging the enemy by giving it what it wants doesn’t qualify as “magnificent” in my book. The Democrat Party, as it currently exists with its uber infantilism, may be in its death throes, but it would be naïve to think that it won’t be rebuilt in one form or another with new faces at the helm because there will always be those who crave power and who see a divided nation as their means of getting it.

    Like

    • I agree totally. “Magnificent” is much too strong, I could go for “impressive” or “outstanding” on the high side, but magnificent, no. I don’t know that he won over many fence-sitters, it’s too early for that, but he likely did create doubt about whether he was a viable alternative to another dictator like Obama or Clinton. That would be the first stage to winning over the non-believers – creating doubt. I do think that if he actually follows through on things like immigration, creating jobs, rebuilding our military, and cutting taxes, he can be assured of a second term no matter who the dems run.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: