The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) today scored a significant victory when Congress agreed to review a final rule by the Obama administration that would wrongly strip law-abiding Americans of their Second Amendment rights. View Related Articles
“Congress’s decision to review the Obama administration’s back-door gun grab is a significant step forward in restoring the fundamental constitutional rights of many law-abiding gun owners,” said Chris W. Cox, executive director, NRA-ILA. “The NRA has been fighting this unconstitutional government overreach since it was first discussed and we look forward to swift congressional action to overturn it.”
Last year, the Social Security Administration finalized a proposed rule to ban certain recipients who use a representative payee from owning firearms. This ill-conceived action stripped the right to keep and bear arms without due process from some of the most vulnerable Americans.
The NRA immediately opposed the Obama administration’s efforts when the proposal was first announced in summer of 2015. The NRA has fought every step of the way to ensure that social security recipients are not stripped of their rights without due process of law.
Congress is now going to review the Obama administration’s unconstitutional ban under the Congressional Review Act (CRA). CRA allows Congress to dispose of any actions an outgoing administration initiates in its last six months. This final rule falls under that time frame, and the review process is expected to move forward in the House and receive a vote as early as next week.
“We are pleased that Congress is moving swiftly to ensure that law-abiding Americans’ constitutional rights are respected,” concluded Cox. “We would like to thank Reps. Sam Johnson (R-TX) and Ralph Abraham (R-LA) for leading this effort in the House, as well as with Speaker Paul Ryan for his leadership on this issue.”
This is good news, especially for many of our veterans who were the prime target of O’s gun grab. He used the Social Security Administration and the VA to specifically to go after veterans who used family members or friends to help keep their checkbook in order and pay bills. O’s claim was that if they weren’t capable of maintaining their finances without assistance, they weren’t fit to purchase guns, which of course, one has absolutely nothing to do with the other.
What makes this news even better is that it’s going through Congress rather than via another EO from Trump. This was an unconstitutional action by O and assuming Congress reverses this, the law will stand and can’t be undone by another Dem president in the future (God forbid) without Congressional action.
I wouldn’t put money on it just yet, but perhaps there is hope for our Congress after all.