POLITICO: WHAT IF TRUMP ENFORCES THE LAW?!

From: powerlineblog.com,  by John Hinderaker,  on Nov 29, 2016

trump-immigration-quote

I have been saying for a long time that, while our current legal immigration system poses intractable problems, illegal immigration is relatively easy to solve: we only need to enforce our existing laws. Donald Trump’s appointment of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General signals that he intends to do just that. Politico belatedly tumbles, apparently, to what is going on: “Immigration-hardliner Sessions could execute crackdown as AG.”

If confirmed as Trump’s attorney general, the Alabama senator would instantly become one of the most powerful people overseeing the nation’s immigration policy, with wide latitude over the kinds of immigration violations to prosecute and who would be deported.

As the nation’s top cop, Sessions would be able to direct limited department resources to pursuing immigration cases. He could launch federal investigations into what he perceives as discrimination against U.S. citizens caused by immigration. He would be in charge of drafting legal rationales for immigration policies under the Trump administration.

And Sessions, as attorney general, could find ways to choke off funding for “sanctuary cities,” where local officials decline to help federal officials identify undocumented immigrants so they can be deported.

Doesn’t that sound great? And it’s not all, either. But first, this:

Some immigrant advocates are alarmed by the idea of a Justice Department led by someone they see as far outside the mainstream.

It can’t be “far outside the mainstream” to enforce existing federal law. On the contrary, it is the president’s most fundamental constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. Barack Obama violated this duty, to his everlasting shame. It also can’t be “far outside the mainstream” for Trump and Sessions to carry out the policies on which Trump campaigned and was elected.

Politico adds much more about the powers Sessions will wield as Attorney General. Strangely, however, the most important point comes near the end:

Sessions would have similarly expansive powers when it comes to enforcing immigration law. The attorney general sets guidelines for the types of violations federal prosecutors should pursue.

Von Spakovksy said a Sessions-led Justice Department could, for example, ramp up enforcement of a current ban on employers hiring those who are here illegally.

“If the employer provision is enforced and the news gets out that the Justice Department is finally enforcing that provision … that will lead to large numbers of individuals self-deporting,” said von Spakovsky, now a senior legal fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation.

That is exactly right. The long-promised wall along the Mexican border, already mandated by federal law, may be a good idea but is mostly a distraction. If the executive branch finally carries out its duty to enforce the immigration laws against employers by sending a few farmers, owners of roofing companies, executives of meat packing plants and hotel managers to prison, the job market for illegal aliens will rapidly disappear. The vast majority will then self-deport, to use Mitt Romney’s perfectly appropriate phrase.

All of this is devoutly hoped for by most Americans. In the first days of the new administration, it looks as though 1) Congress will pass a bill repealing Obamacare, 2) Sessions will start to move against illegal immigration, and 3) President Trump will appoint a conservative to the still-vacant Supreme Court seat. This is a trifecta the likes of which we conservatives have not seen in a long, long time.

~~~~~~~~~~

What a novel idea – a president actually enforcing our laws. Especially since we’ve become accustomed to Barack Obama picking and choosing which ones he liked (and enforced) or disliked (and ignored).

I wondered, exactly where in the Constitution did it specify that the president got to pick and choose which laws to enforce and which ones to ignore? Imagine my surprise when I learned that nowhere in the Constitution does it give the president that option – Barack Obama just decided that he outranked the Constitution and didn’t have to honor it – regardless of his oath. Obama’s disdain for the Constitution is one aspect of Obama’s presidency that should occupy significant mention in the history books as they chronicle his two terms.

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution requires the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” The President must enforce all constitutionally valid Acts of Congress, regardless of his view of their wisdom or policy. Obama, the so-called constitutional professor, must have missed that part.

We don’t need new legislation to address the illegal alien problem. Just “faithfully executing” laws already on the books will have the effect of slowing/stopping illegal entry and prohibit employers from hiring candidates who can’t prove legal residency. That alone will have the effect of “self-deporting” thousands, even hundreds of thousands, back to their home countries and remove the incentive that caused the influx of illegals to begin with – jobs.

Most of our immigration woes can be remedied by simply enforcing existing laws – who knew?

Garnet92.

 



Categories: Political

Tags:

6 replies

  1. Don’t you just love how the leftist elites always think they alone are entitled to define what’s “mainstream?” Everything they advocate just happens to be mainstream. What a coincidence! If you repeat a lie often enough simple-minded people will eventually accept it as the truth.

    Devious Obama & Co. thought they could unilaterally rewrite the laws on immigration by “mainstreaming” non-enforcement. If Hillary had been elected and continued his lawlessness that plan most likely would have succeeded.

    Trump should immediately take the federal money that’s going to sanctuary cities and use it to beef up border security and deportations.

    Like

    • CW, both of your first two paragraphs are spot on, couldn’t agree more. As far as Trump’s actions go – if he just enforces the current laws and cuts federal funds to sanctuary cities he’ll be responsible for a chronic case of anus puckeritis infecting the democrats – which could really be serious since they’re already so “full of it.”

      Like

  2. Over the past 8 years Americans have become accustomed to O’s ignoring and breaking the laws, so the libs and the media will go into shock when Trump starts abiding by them. Prepare to hear much moaning and groaning as he finds laws they didn’t even know existed.

    Like

    • Ironic with a capital “I,” huh? Well put Kathy and spot on – the libs have no predisposition to follow the law – at least any law that doesn’t suit their purpose, so I can only imagine how incredulous they’ll be when they find that our immigration system isn’t broken – it’s THEM that are broken.

      Like

  3. Well done, Garnet. Exactly right.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: