U.S. Navy’s Newest Warship Has No Ammunition for Its Big Guns

From: freebeacon.com,  by Natalie Johnson,  Nov 7, 2016

zumwalt-class_ddg-1000_artists_conception

The U.S. Navy is slated to cancel the projectiles for the two big guns that outfit its newest and most advanced warship due to excessive costs that total an estimated $800,000 per round.

The Long Range Land-Attack Projectile, or LRLAP, is the only guided precision ammunition designed to be fired by the USS Zumwalt, a land-attack destroyer that was created to hold two 155 millimeter/62-caliber Advanced Gun Systems that could, according to defense contractor Lockheed Martin, “defeat targets in the urban canyons of coastal cities with minimal collateral damage,” Defense News reported.

The announcement comes just two weeks after the U.S. Navy commissioned the warship.

A Navy official familiar with the program said that the LRLAP’s unit price skyrocketed after the number of Zumwalt class destroyers was cut from 28 to three.

“We were going to buy thousands of these rounds,” a U.S. Navy official familiar with the program told Defense News. “But quantities of ships killed the affordable round.”

The official said no significant performance issues were to blame for the cancellation of the projectiles.

“We don’t have an issue with the gun, and no issue with that ship carrying the gun. We have an issue on the price point,” the official said. “The round was working, the way forward was logical. It’s just that the cost with a three-ship buy became a very high cost.”

The U.S. Navy has not yet publicly confirmed the cancellation of the LRLAP.

 

~~~~~~~~~~

And Washington, D.C. wonders why taxpayers think that we’ve got lunatics in charge there. I’m just an old businessman who understands a budget and volume purchasing, but I’m curious to know how spending about $4 billion dollars apiece for three REALLY BIG paperweights will improve our military preparedness. Without ammunition, that’s what we’re buying; a stealthy, fast destroyer without usable guns. For what purpose? So, now what will our political/military brain trust propose that we do, retrofit these state-of-the-art ships with some old obsolete gun system? And, more importantly, what would that retrofit cost? 

Was it REALLY necessary to cut the number of Zumwalt destroyers from 28 down to 3? It’s not as if our current Navy is overloaded with ships and we’re sorely in need of a new destroyer. Didn’t anyone ever consider the seriousness of that drastic cut? It’s no wonder that American citizens have lost confidence in our “leadership.”

I guess the concept was to reduce the number of new destroyers so Obama and/or Hillary could welcome more new Syrian Muslims or more South American illegals into the country and provide housing, food, and education to pay them for their democrat votes.

We didn’t REALLY need more instruments of war anyway [extreme sarcasm].

Garnet92.

 



Categories: General

Tags:

4 replies

  1. Interesting information tannngl shared there. What do you want to bet that if H wins, all this will miraculously be renegotiated and we’ll manage to find the money for the ammo. She owes them so she has to keep them in business.

    Like

  2. Just wondering here…Lockheed Martin-are they one of the corpporations who contriubed to the Clinton Foundation?

    Like

    • Ok, the answer is yes. Not only that but Comey used to work for Lockheed Martin. And they were a Clinton Foundation donor in 2010. And they were on the chamber of Commerce in Egypt who paid Bill Clinton $250,000 for a speech in 2010.

      “In 2010, Lockheed Martin won 17 approvals for private contracts from the Hillary Clinton State Department.”

      So much entanglement. But I guess it’s ok. It’s the Clintons. And no bullets for our Naval ship guns is ok to-it’s the Clintons.
      (sh, no one really knows all of this.)

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: