Republican Establishment Nightmare: Ted Cruz 2020

From:,  by Sahil Kapur,  on May 3, 2016,  see the article HERE.

While some Republican elites saw karmic justice in Ted Cruz suffering a fatal defeat andending his presidential bid Tuesday in Indiana, they also experienced a nagging fear: the 45-year-old Texan could return in 2020.

If Donald Trump is nominated in July and loses the general election, Cruz, the runner-up, would have a sprawling campaign organization, the precedent of Ronald Reagan and an argument to pursue the prize again. Cruz’s speech announcing his intent to drop out had a cliffhanger.

“Hear me now. I am not suspending our fight for liberty. I am not suspending our fight to defend the Constitution,” said Cruz, a Texas senator. “Our movement will continue. And I give you my word that I will continue this fight with all of my strength and all of my ability.”

Cruz invoked Reagan’s 1976 convention speech, when he was the runner-up for the nomination, and won it four years later. “I think of the speech that Ronald Reagan gave to our party,” Cruz said. “He spoke not of the next four years. … Ronald Reagan spoke of the next 100 years.”

Many party elites worry Cruz will blame a Trump defeat on the real-estate developer’s ideological philandering over the years, and argue that Republicans must nominate a staunchly conservative figure.

“The hope has been that after several years of intra-party warfare this election would offer some level of clarity by settling the question of whether we only go after conservatives or we seek to broaden the party,” said Brian Walsh, a Republican consultant and former leadership aide.

Cruz argued that his nomination in 2016 would have spurred a conservative turnout that would win the party the presidency. Walsh disputed that, saying conservatives turned out in 2008 and 2012.

“The problem is we lost with young voters, we lost with women, we lost with minorities,” he said.

After the 2012 election, the GOP establishment formally concluded that the party must modernize and expand its appeal with Hispanics and unmarried women. Conservative activists disagree, saying a victory requires nominating an ideological purist who will excite the base and supercharge conservative voter turnout.

Rick Tyler, a former communications director for the Cruz campaign, said Cruz’s warnings about Trump will look “prophetic” by the next presidential election cycle.

“I would assume if Trump wins the nomination, he’ll lose the general election badly and bring down the party ticket,” Tyler said. In that scenario, “we’ll have proven over and over again that a moderate can’t win the election, and that a celebrity with no underlying philosophy or principles can’t win. So why not try a consistent conservative for once? He’ll look like an attractive alternative.”

Presidential historian Michael Beschloss saw Cruz’s parting speech as a prelude to 2020.

Cruz 2020 tweet by Beschloss

If he runs again in 2020, Cruz is likely to position himself as the purer candidate than rumored hopefuls who have tried to meld conservatism and pragmatism, like House Speaker Paul Ryan, or even erstwhile rival Marco Rubio, who has a conservative record but who was painted as unreliable by Cruz. The Texan’s likely challenge would be the limited appeal and broad establishment opposition that hindered his 2016 campaign.

Some Cruz supporters at his Indiana election night event were already on board with a re-run in 2020.

Cruz “absolutely” should run again in 2020 if he’s not the nominee in 2016, said Bob Moore, 70, an engineering consultant from Goshen and a Tea Party activist who said he spent primary day waving Cruz signs to voters entering polling locations in Elkhart County, Indiana.

Moore argued that the senator would learn from his first run, and he has attributes he wants in a presidential candidate: integrity, Christian values, and a knowledge of the U.S. Constitution. “I think he should run, and I think he’d be an excellent president.”

Other Cruz fans were more circumspect.

“Like in a basketball series you never talk about the next series until after the current one is over,” said James Brestin, a television engineer who wore a Cruz hat, sticker and t-shirt, and lined up more than an hour early for Cruz’s party at a renovated train station in downtown Indianapolis.

Asked whether Cruz should run in 2020 if he loses the nomination this year, Paul Refior, 65, said, “It depends on what the country’s like then.”

Ron Bonjean, a Washington-based Republican consultant who has worked for several congressional leaders, anticipated that Cruz could make a case for the nomination in 2020.

“He can say that, but he’s already shown an inability to run an effective campaign against a front-running candidate,” he said. “The idea that he’d be the one to take the medal next time probably isn’t there.”

Cruz could find some solace from Trump, who praised his former rival as “a tough, smart guy” during his Indiana victory speech.

“He has got an amazing future,” Trump said.


“It depends on what the country’s like then” is a fair statement. A lot depends on whether Donald Trump has been elected. If Trump has had four years of what I suspect will be unhinged behavior and lack of results on his primary issues, he’ll be ripe for the pickin’s. Of course, Trump’s mishandling will cast a dark shadow over any Republican for many years.

On the other hand, if Hillary is elected, even if she isn’t indicted, she’ll be hounded by evidence leaks from the multitude of investigations into her criminal behavior. She’ll reinforce the reputation that she’s had for years as an evil, duplicitous criminal. She might be beatable then.

If Uncle Joe Biden finds himself in the oval office, he’ll win a second term.

That one guy, Ron Bonjean, said that “he’s already shown an inability to run an effective campaign against a front-running candidate.” That statement screams out “dumbass” to me. What about Trump’s campaign was like any other campaign EVER? This Bonjean guy is apparently oblivious to Trump’s antics, his command of the media, his near 100% name recognition, his self-financing, etc., etc. Just because Ted succumbed to Trump’s army of Trumpanzees, doesn’t mean that he couldn’t have beaten a more “normal” candidate.

I hope he tries – but we will have to see what the lay of the land is in 2020.




Categories: Political


7 replies

  1. The Republican consultant, Brian Walsh, said they need to settle the question of whether they only go after conservatives or we seek to broaden the party. I would say to him that going after conservatives would automatically broaden the party. That was the goal all along until the Trump Train derailed everything. What we’ll see after four years of Trump is the Trumpbots with buyer’s remorse. It will be similar to the denial that the Obama supporters went into after they saw him in action. Nowadays you’ll find very few, if any, voters that admit to voting for him.


  2. I believe Cruz will run in 2020. And we’ll know very soon. He believes he’s destined to be president and believes he is able to do this. His drive is unbelievable and he digs in. Watch him.


    • I like your optimism tannngl! With Ted’s brainpower, I figure that he’ll be a formidable opponent in 2020. I think his only problem will be getting financing sufficient to overcome whoever is already the incumbent. Overall, I sent him almost $1,000 and I’m not a wealthy guy.


      • I’m not wealthy either, Garnet. I believe I sent him $2000. I’d have kept sending it if he had stayed in. Did you see the video of him as a teen ager telling what he planned to do with his life? He said he was going to be president of the United States. hehehe
        This is from his high school year book. I believe he wrote it himself:


  3. I honestly think Ted would have beaten Trump had he had a clear field to set the comparison. The debates would have exposed Trump as the bullying, empty suit that he is. I suspect that whomever Trump faces in the general election will do that pretty easily as well. If Trump loses, I suspect it won’t be close, and the path to the nomination will be open for Cruz 2020.

    Agreed, Garnet, given the divided field, Cruz did very well for a novice national candidate. I believe he entered to try to earn a VP slot, and the big prize was inherited by his skillful tactics, and ineptitude by others. This was a year like none other in my life in observing politics. Given that, I’ll be surprised if there aren’t still more unanticipated twists and turns to come. I can imagine rioting, and perhaps even assassination attempts by the Lefties. I’m not wanting anyone to get hurt, but some heads are going to get knocked. That violence will actually strengthen Trump, and encourage even greater hubris.

    Interesting times!


    • I think you’re right Curtis. This was a very unusual nomination race with two really screwed up factors: Trump and his antics, and seventeen people fighting it out for the nomination. And then, with the last two to drop out (Rubio and Kasich) holding out for political reasons, it was too late by the time the field was winnowed down to two. Cruz had created a game plan and tried to stay on plan, but Trump and his media cohorts kept screwing it up. Ted did give it a good shot, but fell a little short. If some shenanigans go on at the convention, or the rules meeting, it could get really nasty and Trump has done nothing except issued an implied support for violence.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: