We want the same things

We call ourselves conservatives and we’ve been yelling for decades for a presidential candidate who espoused conservative values instead of the bland, middle-of-the-road substitutes forced down our throats by the Republican establishment.

Donald Trump 03

What defines a conservative? We can probably find multitudes of definitions of what constitutes a conservative depending on who’s doing the defining, but there are a number of traits that we can probably agree on.

It’s my belief that most definitions will include references to the following:

  • Adherence to our Constitution and Bill of Rights
  • Individual liberty & personal responsibility
  • Limited government & lower taxes
  • Religious freedom
  • Maintain law & order
  • Free market capitalism
  • A strong national defense

Now, this election, we have a dyed-in-the-wool, honest-to-goodness conservative (Ted Cruz) as a candidate and yet many so-called conservatives have chosen to support Donald Trump. Assuming that most conservatives can agree on most (if not all) of those listed beliefs, how can conservatives reconcile supporting Donald Trump over Ted Cruz?

Recently, on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump gave his definition of a conservative: TRUMP: “Well, I think it’s a person that doesn’t want to take risks. I think that’s a good thing. A person that wants to in terms of government I’m talking about. Person that wants to conserve, a person that wants to in financial sense balance budgets.” It then goes on and on, mentioning oil and the Iraq war, but never coming close to defining what a conservative is – Donald Trump doesn’t know what it means to be a conservative because Donald Trump is NO conservative.

So where are the arguments that Cruz isn’t a conservative? I haven’t seen those. I’ve seen the arguments that some make against Cruz. They’re usually comprised of one or more of the following:

  1. He is not eligible, re: the natural born citizen requirement
  2. He is a “globalist” because his wife (Heidi) worked for Goldman Sachs and was a board member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
  3. He was given millions by Goldman Sachs
  4. He is in the pocket of “Big Oil”
  5. He utilized dirty tricks during his presidential campaign – specifically in Iowa against Ben Carson
  6. He voted for the TPA/TPP
  7. He blamed Donald Trump for the protests that caused the cancellation of a Trump rally
  8. He’s a lying deceitful person

Those are the ones that I’ve seen most often. They’re distributed by the Trump supporters. While honestly there is some truth in a few of them, the majority are total fabrications and easily disproven – to anyone who is interested in the truth.

I’ll take them one at a time:

  1. The eligibility issue isn’t going to be settled by individuals on blogs cutting and pasting arcane sections of historical discussions. The preponderance of the legal experts who have looked at the question and have issued opinions comes down on the side of Cruz being eligible – period.
  2. Yes, Ted’s wife did work for Goldman Sachs. She was an investment banker and has taken an unpaid leave of absence during Ted’s campaign. She was/is NOT a board member of the CFR; her only linkage to the CFR was when she was invited to participate in a working group whose task was to review a paper on the North American Union. Her sole contribution to the project was a one-paragraph response in the final appendix.
  3. Ted was NOT given millions from Goldman Sachs. Ted and Heidi took a margin loan against their investments ($1.43 million) and then loaned the proceeds to his campaign – a common practice for political campaigns. Goldman Sachs DID NOT make a million dollar contribution to Ted’s campaign.
  4. He’s accused of being “in the pocked of Big Oil.” Remember that Cruz is a Senator from Texas, where oil is big business. It is entirely reasonable for him to receive support from the oil industry. Even so, there is NO evidence that he’s done anything unusual or untoward for the oil industry.
  5. Cruz’s campaign was guilty of disseminating an incorrect news item that Ben Carson was ending his campaign. His staff relied on a news report by CNN that spoke of that possibility, but his campaign staff should not have proceeded with that conclusion without checking its veracity. That was wrong and Cruz apologized multiple times publicly to Ben Carson.
  6. Ted first voted for the TPA, and later voted against it. He didn’t vote for the TPP because there hasn’t been a vote on the TPP. He has vowed to vote against it.
  7. He didn’t specifically blame Trump for the protests, he blamed the protesters, but he did say that Trump shared responsibility when he suggested violent actions several times at his speeches and rallies and even said that he might pay the fine for a supporter who was arrested for punching a protester. Only later did Trump disavow any violence.
  8. As far as being a lying, deceitful person – some people have come to believe that about Ted Cruz because Donald Trump made it a staple of his attacks on Cruz. He said it loud and he said it often and consequently some have come to believe it. But just the opposite is true – Trump is actually easily the bigger liar of the two. Don’t take my word for it, see for yourself:

I’ve published the ratings from two fact-checking organizations (PolitiFact and FactCheck.org). Both organizations have applied their fact checking analysis to statements made by both Cruz and Trump and it wasn’t even close. These ratings were downloaded from the site on Wednesday, March 16, 2015, so they’re fully up-to-date.

Here are the PolitiFact’s findings for both men:

Cruz politifact ruling


Trumps politifact ruling 02

If we combine the Mostly False, False, and Pants on Fire categories (all lies), it’s easy to see who is the biggest liar, Trump wins easily (77% of his statements are false or partially false). And note the “Pants on Fire” category, those are especially egregious bald-faced whoppers. Trump takes the trophy there too.

Whatta you know, Trump wins again! Even when the category is the biggest liar – Trump wins that one too. And who is most truthful? More than a third (35%) of Cruz’s statements were judged to be true (or partially true)  while only 22% of Trump’s statements have been true (or partially true). Any yet Trump supporters continue to support him. Would you trust a salesman that you KNEW was going to lie to you? Why would you?


And here is what FactCheck.org had to say about Donald Trump:

“It’s been a banner year for political whoppers — and for one teller of tall tales in particular: Donald Trump.”

“In the 12 years of FactCheck.org’s existence, we’ve never seen his match.”

“He stands out not only for the sheer number of his factually false claims, but also for his brazen refusals to admit error when proven wrong.”

“So, for the first time, we confer the title ‘King of Whoppers’ to Donald Trump.”


And if there is still any doubt about Trump’s truthfulness, here’s a LINK to another article that comes from Politico magazine. They also fact-checked Donald Trump’s statements (hint: he doesn’t come off well there either).

C’mon people, at least be intellectually honest with yourself. You don’t have to admit that Trump is a liar to me or anyone else; you can still support him for whatever reason, but at least be true to yourself and admit that the man is a serial liar and exaggerator and you’d do well to take his promises with a truckload of salt.


Categories: Political


5 replies

  1. Your summary of what makes a conservative is excellent, Garnet. And Trump’s attempt to define conservatism is laughable. That should say it all for anyone who sincerely is a conservative.


  2. Apparently some of those so-called conservatives are willing to trade in their values for the vanilla version of O. It’s acceptable to them that he knows zero about the Constitution and is going to change O’care to T’care instead of turning it back over to the free market. It’s okay with them that he has zero finesse in working with other world leaders and thinks he can bully them into making deals. He knows zero about the military, but that’s okay too because he came out thumping his chest and sounding as mad as the CINOs are about illegal immigrants and refugees. They support and are voting for anger instead of a fixer.


    • And what is so disturbing to me is that this mile-wide divide between Cruz supporters and Trump supporters is coming between friends. In my experience, it has been the Trump supporters who are drunk on the Trump Kool-Aid and don’t want to hear anything bad about their guy. OK, I understand that you disagree – so tell me where I’m wrong.

      This particular piece was done right after I visited a blog run by a mutual friend of ours – she’s been around for years and I’ve always thought of her as a friend, but she just recently wrote some really nasty things about Ted – 90% of which was false (though I’m sure she believes them). I just had to refute much of the falsehoods she had published although she may not be coming back to PT to read my rebuttal. Too bad, she was a nice person.


      • True, it is damaging friendships and that’s indicative of how worried people are about our country. When Trump first jumped into the race, most all of us were amused by it and thought it a good idea to shake things up a bit, all the while not really taking him seriously as a candidate. Then as time passed, some conservatives just wanted him to go away, while the others went from amusement to obsessed with him.

        At one time, most all conservatives were united against O and his attempts to destroy the country. Now the Trump supporters are dividing America in ways that O couldn’t. His flaws and lies are acceptable to them, but the flaws and mistakes of the Cruz camp are not. It mimics the liberals’ double standards and many times comes with a side order of personal attacks.


      • Good description Kathy. It’s true that many of us underestimated Trump – I know that I did – I never thought that he would be a serious candidate – well, for that matter I still don’t think that he’s a serious candidate – but his supporters do. They are the difference. He’s still the loudmouth egotistical blowhard that he always was, the difference is that his sycophants have elevated him to a godlike level and, as you say, accept his lies and flaws as if they are of no consequence.

        In their eyes, he can do no wrong and they simply won’t accept anything negative being said about him no matter how true it is. They are “under his spell.”

        He is like a Pied Piper leading the children away.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: